PPGAPPGA
Interativo
PT 01 / 12
Professional master's dissertation · Mackenzie · 2026

The people who look after your diploma need training too

Behind every diploma there are records, regulation and coordination teams that must follow Ministry of Education rules that change all the time. The dissertation listened to 131 of these professionals and, based on what they said, designs a platform to train them: GENESIS360. Explained in 12 screens.

Author: Ana Paula Marques Jaquel da Silva Advisor: Prof. Dr. Gilberto Perez Program: Professional Master's in Business Development Administration · Mackenzie Presbyterian University
Rules on the diploma: 11 of 11 Teams
Closest UN Sustainable Development Goal
scroll
02 The problem · an example

A single diploma goes through eleven rules

To show how complex it gets, the author gathered the rules that touch the undergraduate diploma in Brazil, from the 1996 education law to the 2025 policy. Tap each one.

Play the records office

Graduation was 40 days ago

issue
send
register
graduation60 days75135 days

Table 5 of the dissertation (source: Brazil, 2025). It is an example put together by the author, not the full body of law. Subjects grouped by us. Deadlines of Ordinance 1,095/2018 added up in sequence by us; they can be extended with justification, and sending to a registering body only applies when the institution does not register its own diplomas.

03 How teams learn

Many learn alone, or only when the law changes

Before you see what the 131 professionals answered: where you work (or study), how does the team learn the rules?

The author's diagnosis (SWOT analysis)

Answers: section 2.3.2, finding a; the dissertation does not detail the remaining 20.5% (our calculation). Figure 7 and section 2.3.3.1: the author built the matrix from her experience in the field and checked it against the questionnaire answers.

04 The method

The author heard from 131 professionals, then 69 more

The method is Design Science Research: instead of only describing a problem, the research designs a solution (an "artifact") for it. The starting point was two online questionnaires.

Stage 1 · diagnosis
Invitation to 200 professionals through WhatsApp groups, e-mail and LinkedIn, between June and July. 131 answered (65.5%): profile, daily dealings with the rules, difficulties and what they would think of a platform.
Stage 2 · the modules
Invitation to 150 institutions. 69 answers (46%) rated from 1 to 5 how important each of the eight modules planned for the platform would be.

Section 2.3.1. In one passage, stage 1 appears with 133 answers (66.5%); we follow the 131 in the figures and in the rest of the text.

Figures 1 to 4. Dots calculated from the percentages in the figures (our calculations). In Figure 1, program coordination and academic leadership appear without a number; together they make up 9.2%. In Figure 4, the "never" slice has no number either (about 2%).

05 Stage 1 · 131 professionals

Almost everyone wants a platform like this

Your answer:

Dependence: Figure 5. Productivity: Figure 6. Usefulness: Question 8 (section 2.3.2), with counts calculated from the percentages. The three questions use the same height scale (people). These are opinions given before the platform existed, and the scores pile up at the top of the scale, the "ceiling effect" the author herself points out.

06 Open answers

The difficulties, in the words of those who answered

The author grouped the open answers into four difficulties. Tap each card to read the excerpts.

Findings a, b, c and d in section 2.3.2. Excerpts in quotation marks come from the answers to Question 9, as the dissertation quotes them (translated by us); the others are the author's summaries; she does not count how often each difficulty came up. Summary of the open answers: Table 1.

07 Stage 2 · 69 answers

The rules first, the game later

The platform was planned with eight modules. All of them got many high scores. Place your bet: which one got the fewest?

content on the ruleshow to teachfollowing the team

Table 2: share of scores of 4 and 5 (scale of 1 to 5), 69 answers (68 for the Curriculum Guidelines). Bars start at zero. Color groups are ours, based on the author's reading (section 2.3.3.2).

08 Stage 2 · factor analysis

For those who answered, the eight modules go together

People who gave one module a high score tended to give high scores to the others. All 28 correlations between pairs are positive, and a factor analysis found a single factor, which the author called "Latent management demands".

0.867KMO: data suitable for the analysis, according to the author
0.355 to 0.730range of the correlations between pairs
1 factorweights from 0.694 to 0.829

Table 3 (weights in the factor; minimum residual extraction) and Table 4 (Pearson correlations). The text says the correlations range from 0.335 to 0.730, all with p < 0.001; in the table, the smallest is 0.355, with p = 0.003. We follow the table.

09 The gap

Nobody brought the rules and the training together

In the author's market analysis, by the end of the work there was no platform in Brazil dedicated to training the teams of private higher education institutions in the Ministry's rules with practical application. Tap each kind of solution.

Section 2.3.4.5. The examples of each kind are the ones the author cites. Approximate positions: our reading of what the author says about each kind, not a measurement.

10 The proposal

Try out the idea behind GENESIS360

An app (and later a website) that an institution subscribes to in order to train its team: courses in learning paths by role, rules always up to date, checklists and a dashboard for managers. Pick a role on the phone and look around.

Our illustration · the platform does not exist yet

Redrawn from the author's prototype (Figures 12 and 13, made in Figma) and the modules in section 2.5.2. Paths by role: topics from section 3.1; checklist: deadlines from Table 5; the rest is an example. Planned technology: a React Native app with data in the cloud, protected under Brazil's data protection law (LGPD).

11 Application and evaluation

The platform has targets but no results yet

The dissertation ends with a plan: test GENESIS360 in three cycles and measure six indicators. The author herself calls these numbers hypothetical benchmarks, not results.

1Working prototypebasic learning paths and dashboards (the "minimum viable product")
2Pilotat a partner institution, with support and feedback collection
3Continuous improvementwith data on use, usability and compliance

Business model: a monthly subscription paid by the institution, with a setup fee of R$ 10,000 to 20,000 and a monthly fee of R$ 2,000 to 6,000 (prices "to be confirmed"), plus a version that plugs into the management systems institutions already use. Target: 50 institutions and 3 system partners in two years.

Sections 4.1, 4.2 and 6. The abstract and the final remarks cite "100% compliance" and "a 30% reduction in errors" as expected results; in section 4.2 the author makes clear they are targets to be measured once the platform is tested. The striped band shows that nothing has been measured yet.

12 In practice, limits and credits

What this proposal leaves us

For those who run institutions

For the author, continuously training records, coordination and management teams has become a critical success factor. Depending on a few veterans leaves the institution vulnerable when they leave.

For the teams

Many answers ask for the rules to be translated: turning each rule into step-by-step guidance, with process templates and checklists.

For entrepreneurs

In the author's words, applied innovation is born from listening to real problems, including the silent ones. In highly regulated markets, the edge lies in offering certainty with a simple digital experience.

Next steps

Build the prototype, run the pilot and measure the six indicators; extend the idea to other topics (evaluation, distance learning) and to other Latin American countries.

What this research does not say

  • A proposal, not a product. The platform was designed and prototyped on screen but not yet tested; the indicators are targets. · according to the author (section 4.2)
  • Opinion before use. The usefulness is what people imagined without having used the platform, and the scores pile up at the top of the scale. · ceiling effect pointed out by the author
  • Who answered. The invitation went out through the author's network (WhatsApp, e-mail, LinkedIn), and 87% were from private institutions; the author acknowledges the limited diversity. The profile of the 69 in stage 2 is not described. · author and our note
  • Who proposes it. The research was carried out by the consultancy that will offer the platform (ARMOR), as is common in professional master's programs. · our note

Credits

How to cite
SILVA, Ana Paula Marques Jaquel da. GENESIS360: proposta de solução tecnológica para capacitação em processos acadêmicos [GENESIS360: a technological solution proposal for training in academic processes]. Dissertation (Professional Master's in Business Development Administration) — Mackenzie Presbyterian University, São Paulo, 2026. Advisor: Prof. Dr. Gilberto Perez.

Design Science Research, two online questionnaires, SWOT analysis and market analysis. According to the author, Figures 8 to 10 were made with ChatGPT and the prototype in Figma. This version simplifies the work for a general audience; the full business plan is in the original text.